48

How do you approach a WARDOGS match when three teams are fighting over one zone?

Closed thread Closed by archive
u/rustycompass·3 months ago

I've been trying to understand what actually matters most in WARDOGS. With three teams contesting a zone, it seems like winning one fight doesn't necessarily mean you've made a good play.

You can clear one side and immediately get pushed from another. Meanwhile, everybody seems to be spending money on gear and vehicles.

What do you think matters most here: holding the zone, watching the surrounding approaches, or waiting for the other teams to fight first?

I'm interested in actual strategy discussion, not another list of generic FPS tips.

From the guide: Wardogs Cheats Buyer's Guide: What to Check Before You Buy

6 comments Explore the guides

comments 6

Replies are closed
M
u/mapgremlin·2 months ago

Positioning, honestly. Winning a gunfight and then standing in the open celebrating is a classic way to get introduced to team number three.

B
u/brickbybrick·2 months ago

The building and destruction mechanics make it interesting too. I wouldn't assume a building is going to stay useful as cover forever.

L
u/lowbudgetloadout·2 months ago

People also need to think about the cash economy. Buying expensive gear every single life without a plan sounds like a speedrun to an empty wallet lol.

S
u/sectorseven·last month

I disagree a little on waiting for other teams. If everyone waits, nobody takes the zone. Timing matters, but somebody still has to commit.

N
u/no_scope_nana·4 weeks ago

The best plan is apparently to enter the zone confidently and then discover that the entire server had the same idea.

R
u/rustycompass·2 weeks ago

That last part sounds painfully believable as a general WARDOGS strategy problem. The three-team setup definitely makes positioning more complicated than a normal two-sided fight.